From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 2E1DC3858413; Sat, 23 Sep 2023 08:45:18 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2E1DC3858413 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1695458718; bh=b8VVPB50HlqNihTLc6+PXqtOXiD8n1ReoBjR8D8gWkA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=jw3BdjSVA5RHXxtT0rAbihJVbTNIV0nTvaD+drXB3YXDjK9casanNFC1uFUL38DzP tUCuIkraIxuxRbRyohWYVezv6XYpyX77ms+frTN0QgP4e1sPvjhmJIZcsLfwOMYQxT FUxscecCPJLwSj0dmhDhZi3XJZB/Lf5CL7C8fV1I= From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/111547] New: [OpenMP] -fopenmp omp::decl update missing Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2023 08:45:12 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: documentation X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status keywords bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111547 Bug ID: 111547 Summary: [OpenMP] -fopenmp omp::decl update missing Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: documentation Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org CC: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- We need to add omp::decl to invoke.texi: @item -fopenmp Enable handling of OpenMP directives @code{#pragma omp} in C/C++, @code{[[omp::directive(...)]]} and @code{[[omp::sequence(...)]]} in C++ and @code{!$omp} in Fortran. and @item -fopenmp-simd Enable handling of OpenMP's @code{simd}, @code{declare simd}, @code{declare reduction}, @code{assume}, @code{ordered}, @code{scan}, @code{loop} directives and combined or composite directives with @code{simd} as constituent with @code{#pragma omp} in C/C++, @code{[[omp::directive(...)]]} and @code{[[omp::sequence(...)]]} in C++ and @code{!$omp} in Fortran.=20 How do we handle 'loop' for the here? It sounds either wrong or misleading;= it surely does not imply multiple threads here.=