From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 11005385781F; Thu, 14 Mar 2024 23:37:57 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 11005385781F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1710459477; bh=UvrXCBiM7GGVLRfGqfvlhD1wU4QWXhgpxEwlBQvMumI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=xBmFIGVSRaUXydV15/aBG+H9/qpD9B55+pwSf7Ufv3iJFz45l/v9oN8nhgWUBuI44 hMBWp9GWrJBSKu9zJauzrUVDZLaqI7zjngf60j/u4n5wJVmM37/CB823Rmb6+lneNJ TZzH6jMT2p+xlw9U05yfyEnFrgP0S1lU+9zD28l8= From: "syq at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/111555] [AArch64] __ARM_FEATURE_UNALIGNED should be undefined with -mstrict-align Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 23:37:56 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: syq at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111555 YunQiang Su changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |syq at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from YunQiang Su --- `-mno-unaligned-access` is also supported by MIPSr6. I guess we should add a more generic macro for this case? Is __UNALIGN_ACCESS_DISABLED__ OK? For AArch64, clang supports `-mno-unaligned-access`, while gcc doesn't, should we add it as an alias of -mstrict-align?=