From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 29CE13858D28; Tue, 14 Nov 2023 14:20:01 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 29CE13858D28
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1699971601;
	bh=Y7sSHWnqinORB4GmFrv7tFoE+U0XmUoj/avCgh13pqg=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=UuC/WIIHMps4UWfB/5SEvk2qrASF94webMqSSRRmdxSiAGJViAdwI8+/0RO1phKw9
	 /dit8dozf/lZFKeGs7WEc4HrXnmOZJmGFb/T3T35eabQ0zaLNiAsiw/a4wa+xkT4/h
	 rYQvV9XBB5S0n3LuTc51O1vttzOHQS+1JSpyYlK4=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/111572] [14 Regression] Wrong code at -O2 on
 x86_64-linux-gnu since r14-301-gf2d6beb7a4d
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 14:20:00 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-bisection, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-111572-4-5PWbsRK2gG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111572-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111572-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111572

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED

--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Yep, the testcase looks very related.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 111445 ***=