From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 24A583857715; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 07:09:28 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 24A583857715
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1695625768;
	bh=7PDWCsxHqhFcuOoBOyZE61rqvYUVzqZ1HyI4G0iU/2U=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=yUITdwfjOqqg0gWdTlEeZnswQfk0oJkq55IK2Vef/PmSbL4zzf0N+R2BJkdxA82Kw
	 ldcuCnYCYKbCTSPgkgSMpUKsOZH5EETXNdCpdFkUboKr4tvUm8m4L7EIKCqLPakzZk
	 wAKvFyl3dnHZCGbKNMVTP/hL6vCtizgNje9bFzww=
From: "cptarse-luke at yahoo dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/111581] [arm-none-eabi-gcc] / suboptimal optimization /
 uxth/sxth
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 07:09:27 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.3.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: cptarse-luke at yahoo dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-111581-4-hr4rimPurv@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111581-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111581-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111581

Luke <cptarse-luke at yahoo dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #3 from Luke <cptarse-luke at yahoo dot com> ---
nope... i didn't know bug 60749... and it does not happen, when i omit the
"volatile"...

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 60749 ***=