From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id AECC83857C41; Fri, 13 Oct 2023 01:39:21 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AECC83857C41
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1697161161;
	bh=vA8y2gBnjKxM97nLMR5XwHLxV1Hsbixmiq4O2W3642I=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=uB4Meu0UPCV1kuhP1UJCd54bxYCeIBG9tzhrn2Li6LnnPVKJO2TJshMWHd7QD+Zo8
	 oJdhs8ODnfivrDBYRMO+AjbHXyjyhH+Ew4zOo/Xaowi09L8rmWXnICgyz9OVUyuwTz
	 mncgUjc7oQJczXoU1SPzpSMN34UZ3zXMulAEhvgc=
From: "juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/111600] [14 Regression] RISC-V bootstrap time regression
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2023 01:39:21 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: compile-time-hog, needs-bisection
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-111600-4-BSm8B2BKFY@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111600-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111600-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111600

JuzheZhong <juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai

--- Comment #24 from JuzheZhong <juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai> ---
(In reply to Robin Dapp from comment #23)
> For the lack of a better idea (and time constraints as looking for compil=
er
> bottlenecks is slow and tedious) I went with Kito's suggestion of splitti=
ng
> insn-emit.cc
>=20
> This reduces this part of the compilation with eight threads to 40s (from=
 10
> min before).  I evenly split the number of patterns into the 10 files but=
 it
> just so happens that the last file will receive all the problematical
> maybe_code_for functions, so that file makes up for most of the 40s.  The
> rest usually takes 5-20s.
>=20
> Doing bootstrapping tests now, going to post an initial patch once it's
> "presentable".

Hi, Robin. I believe your patch can solve the compile-time issue.

But I wonder whether it can fix memory consumption too ?=