From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 56F483858CDA; Thu, 2 Nov 2023 09:31:56 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 56F483858CDA DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1698917516; bh=MYuX8kn2asJRJFe7s3QlK/HCIQY/rmTdQEQ4WjX+Y50=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=RmnwTKjF3Zr1nrPfxLzI2Mqs7TflWO5w9/YC08Ltq803QAxNmsaX+L7tVU144Zcp4 ipIxIs0m/h3Ab6ouFhvobMPxdpxm5lM/5a4ZeRgQ//RWfOdojD2Ho5R1z8LJslh5HF 10LZgFks0l6vgz1m4/9NGttGl3mWQFb+k4YtiLlk= From: "rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/111600] [14 Regression] RISC-V bootstrap time regression Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2023 09:31:53 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: compile-time-hog, needs-bisection X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111600 --- Comment #30 from Robin Dapp --- On my machine it is not nearly as bad as insn-emit.cc. What dominates for = me with a GCC 13 host compiler is the already fixed insn-opinit problem. How long does it take for you (maybe in % of the total build)? In principle splitting it should be similar to insn-emit and mostly mechanical.=