public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/111600] [14 Regression] RISC-V bootstrap time regression
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2023 08:04:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-111600-4-L9MXMRV09B@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-111600-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111600

--- Comment #27 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On Fri, 13 Oct 2023, rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:

> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111600
> 
> --- Comment #26 from Robin Dapp <rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> So insn-opinit.cc still takes 2-3 minutes to compile here, even though the file
> is not gigantic.
> With the same GCC 13.1 x86 host compiler I see:
> 
>  phase opt and generate             : 170.28 ( 99%)   0.75 ( 48%) 171.43 ( 99%)
>   561M ( 60%)
>   callgraph functions expansion      :  35.04 ( 20%)   0.50 ( 32%)  35.65 (
> 21%)   356M ( 38%)
>  callgraph ipa passes               : 135.02 ( 79%)   0.24 ( 15%) 135.55 ( 78%)
>    96M ( 10%)
>  tree Early VRP                     : 127.83 ( 75%)   0.00 (  0%) 128.11 ( 74%)
>  3141k (  0%)
> 
> Would need to re-check if this still happens with a GCC 14 host compiler.  If
> so, that might be worth investigating as it seems pretty localized.

See PR111622

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-10-13  8:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-26 13:35 [Bug target/111600] New: [14.0 regression] " schwab@linux-m68k.org
2023-09-26 17:41 ` [Bug target/111600] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-27  7:36 ` [Bug target/111600] [14 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-27  7:47 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2023-09-27  7:50 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2023-09-27  8:00 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-27 13:36 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2023-09-27 17:50 ` palmer at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-27 18:22 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2023-09-28  8:06 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2023-09-28  9:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-28 13:14 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-02 15:03 ` rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-02 15:28 ` kito at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-03 15:26 ` kito at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-04  6:46 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-04  8:17 ` rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-04  9:07 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2023-10-04 12:50 ` rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-04 13:13 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-04 13:21 ` rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-04 13:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-04 14:38 ` rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-12 11:50 ` rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-13  1:39 ` juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai
2023-10-13  7:28 ` rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-13  8:01 ` rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-13  8:04 ` rguenther at suse dot de [this message]
2023-10-31 12:35 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-01  2:24 ` juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai
2023-11-02  9:31 ` rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-06 18:15 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2023-11-06 22:07 ` juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai
2024-03-04  4:31 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-30  8:26 ` [Bug target/111600] [14/15 " cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-07  7:42 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-111600-4-L9MXMRV09B@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).