From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 6707C3858CDB; Wed, 18 Oct 2023 21:26:31 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6707C3858CDB
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1697664391;
	bh=pHOOfrJ7UMiKqrrdrbxfyIeNMgOIvBD2iUOmamDQClk=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=QlhBker/0R+igQyTrdppxqseEM10QCJnRRPrpB1qsgpFiWrMk6HIOTSp189ZMjhHi
	 8QvhwRnuFUn2h7hrx69hLGCqXlPMhl+HchPZa0xp2wB3/oTqB+zuFU8dcXkUwY+RyX
	 J0ugP9Ly4NEMmk3f5YxYmLg7SedcGGXbj2ZXBYIM=
From: "bergner at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/111601] [14 Regression] bootstrap fails in
 stagestrain in libcody on x86_64-linux-gnu and powerpc64le-linux-gnu
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 21:26:31 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build, ice-on-valid-code, needs-bisection
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-111601-4-LZRD14gn6y@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111601-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111601-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111601

--- Comment #6 from Peter Bergner <bergner at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #4)=20
> > CCing richi and jakub to see if they've seen anything like this before?
>=20
> I suspect we are miscompiling the final compiler somehow. I linked 2 other
> reports which reported that PGO is causing wrong code; I have not looked
> into confirming them yet though.

Thanks and yes, I agree.  Luckily those test cases are MUCH smaller than gcc
itself.  Hopefully the bug is the same!=