From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 7761D3858422; Mon, 27 Nov 2023 12:24:04 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7761D3858422
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1701087844;
	bh=1mJRdE3mKnCUIweElQFgeg6987xLZDLecbymREz0ogk=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=qqbArrvSm/0yepvMYlYZ4WPhD984V2y53D6pmIWV17t89+vwXHj1IumPMFMN0YvqX
	 S5IFpwYE4AAvDSk6tlqA436JCD08OZRZNevQYTT3zAB9/Na4IobL4LAYrZON3YHwuu
	 ZmfrvunWw/Fl3vizq1pfOfUvx0v0qd2s62WB0120=
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/111601] [14 Regression] profilebootstrap fails in
 stagestrain in libcody on x86_64-linux-gnu and powerpc64le-linux-gnu
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 12:24:04 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build, ice-on-valid-code, needs-bisection
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenther at suse dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-111601-4-wa11omdabS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111601-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111601-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111601

--- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On Mon, 27 Nov 2023, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:

> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111601
>=20
> --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> r14-4662 still builds ok and r14-4668 fails, wonder which of those commit=
s it
> is.

My bet is r14-4664-g04c9cf5c786b94=