From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 495BB3858C50; Thu, 8 Feb 2024 12:34:21 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 495BB3858C50 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1707395661; bh=MSxiTmKW6FUm8Jx+qOMA1dbigaKeqbi/00YY4h5E2pg=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=g2PD/+6LqBExAy4NQ4VCWx0V0ytL5/v4mnp2hZBBrHColHG47zRIAoWkdshHySOxc ZUJjAyJ14AMclS8s+lqCZ9iLxMRp/Nz2TkmgAKVltNvbHcWUfcxP0edoH6PM92m703 gLoI5iU7q1Jc/PxNggDDTG+ct+iy8PD+T48S5/LE= From: "arsen at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/111632] gcc fails to bootstrap when using libc++ Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2024 12:34:21 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build, patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: arsen at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111632 --- Comment #9 from Arsen Arsenovi=C4=87 --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8) > I certainly work on stage 1 all the time, that is where I develop everyth= ing > I do > (of course once something is written, I test it with full bootstrap, but > discovering issues there is too late). > Non-bootstrapped compiler has the added bonus that it defaults to -O0 -g > building of objects when they are rebuilt when doing make inside of the g= cc > directory. right, I do the same, but that can be guarded by checking whether bootstrap= is enabled, no?=