From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 83AFD3858C36; Wed,  6 Mar 2024 13:48:13 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 83AFD3858C36
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1709732893;
	bh=a4SxnsKWyTiVzadwdp2gElbTz8MwqgYjLgwzdYH7SQk=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=wXFDVX6R6JITqRL6v1GgOAcGYOwH6dSdFFqdykk8MkTpp2Nq+pXTKDJVNwJUmdNzn
	 hjGRB2EMPLztfws9k8TTnHKJRqEnIWH6XAj8orj5MORi6ubXDvRidK8AOn3rzqGexk
	 +WWZ3nPpkzmORBNkfBYcLCdgVqRTOBMbmc0dgfAc=
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/111632] gcc fails to bootstrap when using libc++
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2024 13:48:13 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build, patch
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-111632-4-FIv9d0EgPC@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111632-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111632-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111632

--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Dimitry Andric from comment #10)
> Note there are other issues with poisoned identifiers, so I'll ask again:=
 is
> a non-bootstrapped build even supposed to work, and officially supported,=
 or
> not?

Yes.

> Or more qualified, is a non-bootstrapped build only officially supported
> when building on a host with gcc and libstdc++?

No.

But just because something is officially supported doesn't mean it's a high
priority for everybody involved. Some things just take longer to resolve.=