From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 823923858D37; Mon,  2 Oct 2023 02:52:34 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 823923858D37
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1696215154;
	bh=O9uGPr7W6cDF9RLOSxyGlhi2/9sH7vjSv/3Dy9QnkIw=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=mX2cosS+I/jlAvX27zBnijiQ6bNCsbez7dU0vIba381Sk+aDWPNoZYTIYPieWzsQq
	 hBxvuyHF/j7DQS0IY0+T8iGtAym1k/pIrHTZBU4LW3UT6z4iZIzn/AnUU7U9D0ZTYL
	 Hewh9eIfoKMceatmPxnGXPifSvtwKLKFrWo5iK2k=
From: "slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: =?UTF-8?B?W0J1ZyBib290c3RyYXAvMTExNjQyXSBbMTQgUmVncmVzc2lvbl0g?=
 =?UTF-8?B?Ym9vdHN0cmFwNCBvciBwcm9maWxlZGJvb3RzdHJhcCBmYWlsdXJlOiBwb2x5?=
 =?UTF-8?B?LWludC5oOjQ1Mzo1OiBlcnJvcjogdG9vIG1hbnkgaW5pdGlhbGl6ZXJzIGZv?=
 =?UTF-8?B?ciDigJhsb25nIGludCBbMV3igJkgKHBvc3NpYmx5IHNpbmNlIHIxNC00MzM5?=
 =?UTF-8?B?LWdlYWE0MWE2ZGMxMjdkOCk=?=
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2023 02:52:31 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-111642-4-Q21m6VcbtT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111642-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111642-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111642

--- Comment #14 from Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Sandiford from comment #13)
> Created attachment 56023 [details]
> Tentative fix

Re " That now triggers a warning
in some configurations, since the NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS>1 tests
used the global poly_int64, whose definition does not depend
on the template parameter."

Minor note: it's a type error for clang++ and g++ -fchecking=3D2, not just a
warning. I think both gcc and clang do reject the code as they see a type
mismatch in `poly_int64<1, T>(1,1)` call.

Otherwise the fix works for me and passes `make bootstrap4`. Thank you!=