From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 995B638319EE; Sat, 30 Sep 2023 12:34:32 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 995B638319EE DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1696077272; bh=FU+f9u6hj9hORGqliUpSMqCJiwRnAgEKcIsh+4ZgCEs=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=aE7Pj1ZUIoN7ydv6ugIwtY4v4F3akKQQV44wUiFPSLfZH1lCNUxnK9t0Z7zylnxwp OsoDINnQdO2qX17yb/FequAhi4mz04G+io+wmudeTcx1EU1SPmtMc9s+8KkeKdllhp ttYxsRu85SEL7J75uClW2IyeHHdaf1wN1C971wQ0= From: "slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: =?UTF-8?B?W0J1ZyBib290c3RyYXAvMTExNjQyXSBbMTQgUmVncmVzc2lvbl0g?= =?UTF-8?B?Ym9vdHN0cmFwNCBvciBwcm9maWxlZGJvb3RzdHJhcCBmYWlsdXJlOiBwb2x5?= =?UTF-8?B?LWludC5oOjQ1Mzo1OiBlcnJvcjogdG9vIG1hbnkgaW5pdGlhbGl6ZXJzIGZv?= =?UTF-8?B?ciDigJhsb25nIGludCBbMV3igJkgKHBvc3NpYmx5IHNpbmNlIHIxNC00MzM5?= =?UTF-8?B?LWdlYWE0MWE2ZGMxMjdkOCk=?= Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2023 12:34:32 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: dependson Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111642 Sergei Trofimovich changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |111647 --- Comment #6 from Sergei Trofimovich --- (In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #5) > I'll try to extract smaller example. Got the following, but I'm not sure it's valid C++: struct poly_int { template constexpr poly_int() : poly_int() {} }; template void run() { poly_int(); } Filed PR111647 and will try to extract something less invalid. Referenced Bugs: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111647 [Bug 111647] g++ accepts different c++ on -fchecking=3D anf checking=3D2=