From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 59D893858C50; Sat, 30 Sep 2023 19:25:21 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 59D893858C50 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1696101921; bh=2ticzfISl8r0Vd+g/ODDmKXh8Ci+GcilmtC8l3cMd+w=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=nWjMJXz06jIYV8fT8HOWSWK/mtdN9IhE/y7B0Pj5mXMjk7yUemwN4B1AiyS0c+vHG Qvq6BSh2lEmFFcpi6BaeCt49E1njxPg9mM8ePmfzB8qUEEWAVMtrSWN4RpehHZeLhk IL1f4CEMlOuP47vojTljsFh4DEpyypkOfFAlqyAE= From: "slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: =?UTF-8?B?W0J1ZyBib290c3RyYXAvMTExNjQyXSBbMTQgUmVncmVzc2lvbl0g?= =?UTF-8?B?Ym9vdHN0cmFwNCBvciBwcm9maWxlZGJvb3RzdHJhcCBmYWlsdXJlOiBwb2x5?= =?UTF-8?B?LWludC5oOjQ1Mzo1OiBlcnJvcjogdG9vIG1hbnkgaW5pdGlhbGl6ZXJzIGZv?= =?UTF-8?B?ciDigJhsb25nIGludCBbMV3igJkgKHBvc3NpYmx5IHNpbmNlIHIxNC00MzM5?= =?UTF-8?B?LWdlYWE0MWE2ZGMxMjdkOCk=?= Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2023 19:25:21 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111642 --- Comment #8 from Sergei Trofimovich --- With https://gcc.gnu.org/PR111647#c1 I'm convinced it's a gcc's source code= bug and we should not try to write calls like `poly_int<1, T>(1, 1)` with mismatching arity.=