From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 05A44385840D; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 20:39:34 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 05A44385840D
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1696019975;
	bh=W02lKpxa23+EuD1XTkAcT9zwLrd2g7w7icNiT7xfEDs=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=ysvbkV/+uHKMJN7HAhOb4jiHgsNrrY+JseEO00WLde75RAZwc/Ti2V29UXFAzlHHt
	 wFG9rOhZFj7a2uShjRMC1UHKyK+I9fJElxLbNwjXtf/x4ziPEFXgulMHPkWwyGxmuu
	 ajcJ40rSlA+nRpYVNXxCpK9eiMTFOy/TrGnBsO4k=
From: "glisse at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/111643] __attribute__((flatten)) with -O1 runs out of
 memory (killed cc1)
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2023 20:39:34 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-111643-4-4UiKN2NkD1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111643-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111643-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111643

Marc Glisse <glisse at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |glisse at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse <glisse at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> I am 99% sure this is falls under don't do this as flatten inlines
> everything it can that the function calls ...

Maybe people end up abusing flatten because we are missing a convenient way=
 for
a caller to ask that a call be inlined? From the callee, we can use
always_inline (couldn't this be used on name_original in this testcase?), b=
ut
from the caller... Here even a non-recursive version of flatten would have
helped.=