From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 76AEE3858D35; Mon,  2 Oct 2023 23:21:54 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 76AEE3858D35
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1696288914;
	bh=WOOuqgtk2Mour8vwQF2AY6EV4Q3G/F8op5k787eVwjc=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=vqDGdlzze3qRuWzmKgIYvN1n4YMUwsFjGhlG/lQheTAyd4+4oNfdx+Ut/vj9RtLJb
	 9/pIGWuGtVmXSwUrX56QFdQI85HPgjgihItZ1xV9yL7DkT0zLwcYFf92U8D1rmBtWg
	 VT4Yo/K1qd1fsV/UCzAIasBrrCRxa3XO+FmGvhfw=
From: "egallager at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/111654] Introduce clang's invalid-noreturn warning
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2023 23:21:53 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic, patch
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-111654-4-QZHMfpHP2e@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111654-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111654-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111654

Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |egallager at gcc dot gnu.o=
rg

--- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Manuel L=C3=B3pez-Ib=C3=A1=C3=B1ez from comment #4)
> Unfortunately, gcc does not have any patch tracking system

I thought someone was getting a patchwork installation set up?=20
...ok yeah, here it is; it's being hosted on sourceware currently:
https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/gcc/list/
(could be made a little more discoverable from gcc.gnu.org IMO)=