From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 860823857BB3; Mon,  2 Oct 2023 09:41:26 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 860823857BB3
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1696239686;
	bh=/Awr4I/unvi+9mtLIw+3Dd4Tt7dlk1Dy9gYB13nv9nY=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=fdSKMoTCGqDJ7w0UKCh9/VcIQafqbkvY4y1fU7OmYbH8eJY/GGwMpEI2wmkF77qW4
	 0KnDtuCyJukWdzUbp5VfKjuyXAwNGA0H4hGzfRgoUBQ+RPfBP/Xa0OsyPGAwtCUOaf
	 GE/KE++UPFtusfX1Rq/GPKOXrjfuYJjmHlxsKmFU=
From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/111654] Introduce clang's invalid-noreturn warning
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2023 09:41:21 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-111654-4-THLrJjqLa0@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111654-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111654-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111654

Manuel L=C3=B3pez-Ib=C3=A1=C3=B1ez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |manu at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from Manuel L=C3=B3pez-Ib=C3=A1=C3=B1ez <manu at gcc dot gnu=
.org> ---
(In reply to Julian Waters from comment #0)
> Created attachment 56022 [details]
> Patch to add invalid-noreturn to gcc

Patches should be submitted to gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org

For more details, please read:
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GettingStarted#Basics:_Contributing_to_GCC_in_10_e=
asy_steps

Except for clang compatibility, I believe the consensus is that numerical
levels are not user-friendly. I think it would be better to have:

-Wnoreturn-implicit-return
-Wnoreturn-explicit-return

-Winvalid-noreturn enables / disables both.=