From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 782D63858C2A; Sun, 1 Oct 2023 23:59:56 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 782D63858C2A DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1696204796; bh=vrkgO0/1cHQtVUuWzuqSWTDn9F/UPRUcUb/2f1WXE8c=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=iQ0PsujnXRrMt85Oi57NcruQh23z9BHDGE12gU1/feWNpZIb7aYg1276aAUHf68zX nyJZuaeDt71DkEcZtgOf2cWqKb5ZFhnvCXUvUBl8MOlugXLdjbej+0wU6FjBIbYhUa v+0CUP1/DtsoV5nB2vU8cylyeBb5sPwBYGP9g5k4= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/111655] wrong code generated for __builtin_signbit and 0./0. on x86-64 -O2 Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2023 23:59:56 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111655 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- What I am trying to say in comment #3 is both GCC and clang's constant fold= ing is different from what the instruction divsd does in the end.=