From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id D97333858D1E; Sun,  1 Oct 2023 17:42:25 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D97333858D1E
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1696182145;
	bh=voL2INKo+Fisk3TPuvCXd24lLbGPKs6mHu4MD+4WjtM=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=rrzGVXkeci8bX2vgrijqLgSu6WYMhb4R4ARSRRy31Q5edNpKVZb1dSgIOa2mgWWaE
	 kdPopDJJQPYd62I7XMCXYPRIrgQBDOtvi6OfG8ZkxS0Bxm9DU/IkunsWTetMzC4Z9X
	 Q+djktuuXA/i9O0myoWxGJ9AIl1Zyk5zjgFpYeuY=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/111655] wrong code generated for __builtin_signbit and
 0./0. on x86-64 -O2
Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2023 17:42:25 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-111655-4-UehctzfUIi@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111655-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111655-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111655

--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
>=20
> Note GCC and clang even disagree on the first testcase but agree with the
> second one.

Oh and the C and C++ front-end even disagree with each other.=