From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id D450E385AC2B; Fri, 17 Nov 2023 12:07:39 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D450E385AC2B
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1700222859;
	bh=IkWXvQeilQiLqO2LrNg/MwmgWVcT5PfsbtYU9x2rtu0=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=KVFW33haLMcIewApzpNbURwRwIabGGv67LfCNJAEIbS2fPGiUCQdGBjzrY7IHoxrj
	 Of3IwJVPXDT8KeSeHqalDm9n7k5zacbzKvp0/TEK6TLgx8bayeq5+My3ilAeXgVoVh
	 WBKvNUFJbwY/OlY7uBK717N21yB7gF88iwfnhZKM=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/111657] Memory copy with structure assignment from named
 address space should be improved
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 12:07:38 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.3.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ubizjak at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-111657-4-c5SgqwhIEd@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111657-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111657-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111657

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I'd say it is a user error to invoke memcpy/memset etc. with pointers to
non-default address spaces, and for aggregate copies the middle-end should
ensure that the copying is not done using library calls; is that the case a=
nd
the problem was just that optab expansion was allowed for the structure cop=
ies
and the backend decided to use libcall in that case?=