From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 0238A3858D37; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 14:42:24 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0238A3858D37 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1698158545; bh=+6gSd7KhuJj92qBO+fNjc2DiWyfU15KJwsu1XtNOWHU=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=sKhaI4lxxksf2zBonXwN+e6swxUxp5/JbQprqo9sJu9mblxkX2POWB01Hb3VQ3EnT S5CqLjxNeYyBIa3uGlSfz8RSa2+5Sgt5Nb1i2hH6mhq1aJFzcUUCmCKW0a1EWx+c4o PDaZJCGInvl4a1fjQM8b6r4x+4rh0HfmzWQA0RQo= From: "acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/111677] [12/13/14 Regression] darktable build on aarch64 fails with unrecognizable insn due to -fstack-protector changes Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 14:42:24 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111677 Alex Coplan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|WAITING |NEW CC| |acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #11 from Alex Coplan --- Confirmed. The testcase in #c10 ICEs for me on the GCC 12 and 13 branches w= ith -Ofast -fstack-protector-strong -fopenmp -fpic . It doesn't seem to ICE on = the trunk.=