From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id A8FC73858D34; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 10:46:25 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A8FC73858D34
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1711104385;
	bh=wa+04aiyReawSqJ5UMBXX1caBTU3VniseyH0HLkvhnY=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=EkCGHEa0pyEl//2KXN2Ql+2Xw+hD5vRDJsUHmoPrP1jfwUHdVvuvEE14nHxrTIv6w
	 HQGoTVqahk1hYJ3Lrxz7t9WbNGvqhkDJNI4Jj3fNRKDBBbYSNDWNOID/Nnc/flbGfq
	 7R33CrzZGIBx1XNcWqUpVIqxDsqosA44HOuFPNkc=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/111683] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Incorrect answer
 when using SSE2 intrinsics with -O3 since
 r7-3163-g973625a04b3d9351f2485e37f7d3382af2aed87e
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 10:46:25 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.isobsolete attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-111683-4-nffWmEsi7E@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111683-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111683-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111683

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Attachment #57768|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |

--- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 57769
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D57769&action=3Dedit
gcc14-pr111683.patch

Actually for bit-fields, TREE_TYPE on the ref is the underlying type, so ei=
ther
we'd need to somehow better try to understand the actual reference size in =
that
case, or simply look throught the BIT_FIELD_REF COMPONENT_REFs.=