From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 9ACEF385842C; Wed,  4 Oct 2023 01:35:01 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9ACEF385842C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1696383301;
	bh=CioLowwMNb5y3MIscNlXhuBVVixI/D0CaPKXPAHS8yE=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=N4g5CnUiYYGl2qeujN8Ydoqf2d97522jRFDpuOWq4Q+gfyyzWiVG+pc0yVwfA+XQ2
	 FJUdAe9ZR4IzPMdRZryzT11m/Mq044yOcIotClH63xQ/DTuyvIPq+LAb7Xhc2pyZbK
	 ekc5LKkuAhg3UabsPOrr5Sph1m0j3xu4oZd/ZyOU=
From: "xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/111685] Segfault while sorting on array element
 address
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2023 01:35:00 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-111685-4-6AWdP1XlJ8@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111685-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111685-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111685

Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #7 from Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
[alg.sorting] p3:

For algorithms other than those described in 28.7.3, comp shall
induce a strict weak ordering on the values.

Note the terminology "values".  I cannot find the definition of "value" in =
the
standard, but I'm pretty sure the "values" must be independent to "their
addresses" or the entire standard would become completely unreasonable (note
that rvalues has no addresses at all).=