From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id B7FFD3858401; Thu,  5 Oct 2023 18:25:30 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B7FFD3858401
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1696530330;
	bh=EkwkBPQzZuF6kqF/8QAAs1J4JTH/YrjzlTHeBSTkWCk=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=u11PPac3e4ABKZxlLMnz6JtwdnpNkhoF+1FjGeQljZT/RVMvGGs6hfvQdxVLg1rYs
	 Pho0rHduVgR5hBNT71ZGo+klCJEE+gaGpSJDeEKd7ARbPQiMNxoQUdLDPmBc+CthZE
	 B71zR0b0SM0CcmB/vZJJBtqQqADcdJWuBpVsdqFo=
From: "danglin at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug regression/111709] [13 Regression] Miscompilation of
 sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/s_fma.c
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2023 18:25:30 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: regression
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-111709-4-1clIV8fNNP@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111709-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111709-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111709

John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #7 from John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Joseph, is there a way to simplify the glibc test to the failing cases?

Maybe you have a clue as to what has changed.=