public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/111711] [14 Regression] ICE: in maybe_legitimize_operand, at optabs.cc:8046 at -O1 with division by zero
Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2023 08:29:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-111711-4-iQOD7e64K3@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-111711-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111711

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
           Keywords|needs-bisection             |
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2023-10-06
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It was introduced by r14-2667-gceae1400cf24f329393e96dd9720 .

We have:
  long int x;
  int _3;
  _Bool _5;
  _3 = 0 / 0;
  _5 = _3 == 822920;
  x_7 = _5 ? 822920 : 0;

If I disable the added checks on dealing with rtx_equal_p, the ICE goes away.
The problem is the mode for the result does not match the mode for the
comparison (DImode for the result of the conditional and SImode for the
comparison).

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-10-06  8:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-06  5:08 [Bug rtl-optimization/111711] New: " zsojka at seznam dot cz
2023-10-06  7:51 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/111711] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-06  8:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2023-10-06  8:35 ` [Bug middle-end/111711] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-06  8:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-111711-4-iQOD7e64K3@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).