From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id C03C6385694E; Sat,  7 Oct 2023 22:43:34 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C03C6385694E
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1696718614;
	bh=dLe8cKmom2y1nYuzvbZrmh8r6IbcdHosO6N3dEFMCW8=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=qIpYlLbMpZcU9cD5jjbdqCwKTEUiie8yywQZNdfYP1ickNGNM1eTnSTz/M+m6HGSA
	 WvrRn6YZHWc7z+6YRmOBaCFsjinqxv4CuTfqkiw4xyjiAO0FYqms0Mcg/DLCxDD/Bl
	 4DPYel5q3XStuszJ1kHUvHNy+MCigZ0tNfON82OI=
From: "juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/111720] RISC-V: Ugly codegen in RVV
Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2023 22:43:34 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-111720-4-GPY5Rglu7s@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111720-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111720-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111720

--- Comment #5 from JuzheZhong <juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai> ---
Similar issue in GCC 13.2:

https://godbolt.org/z/axKc4qj47

fn:
        lui     a5,%hi(.LANCHOR0)
        addi    a5,a5,%lo(.LANCHOR0)
        ld      a1,0(a5)
        ld      a2,8(a5)
        ld      a3,16(a5)
        ld      a4,24(a5)
        addi    sp,sp,-32
        sd      a1,0(sp)
        sd      a2,8(sp)
        sd      a3,16(sp)
        sd      a4,24(sp)
        li      a5,32
        vsetvli zero,a5,e8,m1,ta,ma
        vle8.v  v24,0(sp)
        vand.vi v24,v24,1
        vs1r.v  v24,0(a0)
        addi    sp,sp,32
        jr      ra


Multiple ld/sd. It seems that we didn't allow natural constant mem pool ???=
?=