From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id AE2F2385840B; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 18:00:45 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AE2F2385840B
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1710180045;
	bh=efQdtvaWdlCa9xr7xpGDoJ3bs35MphQDZhWAGFRhKWk=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=iMb00IjKBvEl/y0etp3CrO/rjUZZkttuQ4oOfATCWqF3jzm3x/mZgF7RJbyrEbj7R
	 /EaMamDuoEt3i/PbRcohCN8HR7zPF0V5A0VsmbwWM04BJ3onCbzZmrjilxNwX0xVtH
	 mJVnzKoJtKHnJWYuh9Wz2Gr4j2+Uho7jvqigLEiA=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libgcc/111731] [13/14 regression] gcc_assert is hit at
 libgcc/unwind-dw2-fde.c#L291
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 18:00:44 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libgcc
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-111731-4-Uifg3iS49R@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111731-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111731-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111731

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Thomas Neumann from comment #11)
> Created attachment 57669 [details]
> patch to handle overlapping ranges
>=20
> Does this patch fix the problem for you? I think it should, but I would
> really like to have a reproducer to make sure.

Note, the formatting is wrong, single statements shouldn't be wrapped in
between { and } in if/else/while/do/for etc. subblocks.=