public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug sanitizer/111736] Address sanitizer is not compatible with named address spaces
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 08:46:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-111736-4-PM5mkWH8Wu@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-111736-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111736
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to rguenther@suse.de from comment #17)
> On Thu, 21 Mar 2024, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111736
> >
> > --- Comment #16 from Uro? Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> ---
> > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #13)
> > > The original testcase is fixed, appearantly slapping 'extern' on the int
> > > makes it not effective.
> > >
> > > Possibly better amend the
> > >
> > > if (VAR_P (inner) && DECL_HARD_REGISTER (inner))
> > > return;
> > >
> > > check though. As indicated my fix fixed only VAR_DECL cases, there's
> > > still pointer-based accesses (MEM_REF) to consider. So possibly even
> > > the following is necessary
> >
> > I must admit that to create the patch from Comment #11 I just mindlessly
> > searched for DECL_THREAD_LOCAL_P in asan.cc and amended the location with
> > ADDR_SPACE_GENERIC_P check.
>
> It might be that the DECL_THREAD_LOCAL_P handling is similarly broken
> in that
>
> int foo (int *p)
> {
> return *p;
> }
No, that is not broken. __thread/thread_local is something that applies solely
to variables. If you take address of a TLS variable, the result is a normal
address space pointer even if TLS uses separate address spaces. Pointer to TLS
var is e.g. on x86-64 load from %gs:0 with offset added to it, while load/store
of a TLS var is load/store from %gs:offset.
So, we actually wouldn't need to punt on DECL_THREAD_LOCAL_P variables, we can
just check their addresses.
We actually don't insert red zones in between the TLS var, so doing it wouldn't
make significant sense.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-21 8:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-09 11:53 [Bug sanitizer/111736] New: " ubizjak at gmail dot com
2023-10-09 12:31 ` [Bug sanitizer/111736] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-09 13:27 ` amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-09 16:27 ` amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-05 13:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-05 14:11 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-05 14:12 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-19 9:29 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2023-12-19 10:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-19 11:04 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-29 9:42 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2024-03-20 20:04 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2024-03-20 21:45 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2024-03-21 6:44 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2024-03-21 7:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-21 7:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-21 7:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-21 8:04 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2024-03-21 8:35 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2024-03-21 8:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2024-03-21 9:18 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2024-03-21 9:26 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-21 9:41 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-21 9:49 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-21 11:49 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-21 12:56 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-22 8:25 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-25 9:13 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2024-03-25 9:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-25 9:45 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-25 10:20 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2024-03-26 10:13 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-30 3:55 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-30 3:55 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-23 17:09 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-23 17:09 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-23 17:09 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-23 17:09 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-24 14:39 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-24 14:39 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-24 14:39 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-24 14:40 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-24 14:41 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2024-05-20 19:53 ` pchelkin at ispras dot ru
2024-05-20 19:56 ` pchelkin at ispras dot ru
2024-05-20 19:57 ` pchelkin at ispras dot ru
2024-05-21 8:19 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2024-05-21 9:01 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2024-05-21 9:03 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2024-05-21 9:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-21 9:20 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2024-05-21 9:55 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-111736-4-PM5mkWH8Wu@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).