From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 082DA3858C39; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:41:23 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 082DA3858C39
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1711014084;
	bh=FI5BRfRfFfbCuFZ9Cs7dv00jp9L15/sa58GFPq1DMO4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=cjdr/8lqdmBpY2vNFrJY/EXe6U3j3cdoozDVen48zQ8XM8mUepAF3n4BhoulD2JzJ
	 1oHVeBhEUC0ptuLLghgd9M+LA4oiZ8gb+TRp03XbAvpUtIwQKUsyRrOVND0I8iEgql
	 NemPtsTFEb1AwpOldejLPCJKwMs1AfId7FY0zyY0=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug sanitizer/111736] Address sanitizer is not compatible with
 named address spaces
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:41:21 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: sanitizer
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: addr-space, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-111736-4-VwR9VDTWfl@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111736-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111736-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111736

--- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #20)
> Though, talking about address spaces, guess we also need to change ubsan.=
cc,
> so that for targetm.addr_space.zero_address_valid (as) case it actually
> doesn't try to
> verify the pointers aren't NULL (it still should check alignment).

I'll handle that.=