From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id DE5763858C54; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 00:32:31 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DE5763858C54
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1696897951;
	bh=cdqMmhFCrfaQ+Q+EpGfdL3/PdQdX8GxNqNDiQ4U1SyQ=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=JCNMW1n5vQSSptxbDEap/2iWR8Hg0sDUymWvkYO8a0f4HAulp2d7jL6TYucqJMu75
	 5eFUMMp/4XyBe9enjr31iSbGOG2yInA1VEaC8aF8UL7mzTDLcBxXkNNEBsb5k88zL/
	 fVz2CGgL7wLkuwwYNk8QtMV2//r7HDutzwVNlm84=
From: "andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/111743] shifts in bit field accesses don't combine
 with other shifts
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 00:32:28 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-111743-4-xXZPUTDZYJ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111743-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111743-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111743

--- Comment #5 from Andi Kleen <andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org> ---

config/i386/i386.h:#define SLOW_BYTE_ACCESS 0

You mean it doesn't define it?=