From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id C51C93858D35; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 21:00:51 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C51C93858D35 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1696971651; bh=y7bIMpztasBPd1Wa5OGekwzXSjAYxJsHgtWnoVEzsXo=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=oaHsVNg1vj3Rm2Udh/BrT2mPBu6kxwfmBggGEy0TODE/UMxI6yuwHy1GV1bc9gbLE cRiF63uBm1Qk2gwhrXH25Y4wsz5bvqJzTDiAEZhHg+ACdQ9lvpqaleNvibSu+XDgT2 1Jj4soDM3F9mbHcpPKpL1Av41fgD7rrBpkRA+2jk= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/111764] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 21:00:51 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-bisection, wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111764 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Note r11-5965-g04bff1bbfc1 just exposed the issue, you can reproduce the > issue before that with `-fno-vector-cost-model` added and it worked with > that option in GCC 9.5.0 but was broken in GCC 10.1.0. Sorry I mean `-fno-vect-cost-model`.=