From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 567D53858C5E; Wed, 11 Oct 2023 02:33:06 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 567D53858C5E
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1696991586;
	bh=LwCb2CEudrhD8LUgCTuyiCNWl7mVRlYs8xp9miq4mVI=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=wZx1PenlHzqTK+brIQ2mp78AfTFDoA0TeDvyEfiqL+qlCe0YLGe2pU6nSzl3jsxaQ
	 ztmUMlWXehAVt1ub4+WtRP0A/uI4VDdXMLmGxqhpNDWUJynR5LqyEavfAmNTZVOsZe
	 NZROcXEyY4aA3ftLEHR9pat9E8SdMsvFl/fPbXBw=
From: "juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/111765] RISC-V: Faild to vectorize
 gen-vect-34.c
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 02:33:05 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-111765-4-RRW6Qt3qEp@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111765-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111765-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111765

--- Comment #2 from JuzheZhong <juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> For SVE:
> /app/example.cpp:6:18: missed:   missing target support for reduction on
> variable-length vectors.
>=20
> I assume it is the same issue for RVV.

Yeah.

So may be we should adjust the dump check:

/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 1 loops" 1 "vect" { target
vect_masked_load && !vect_variable_length } } } */

?=