From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id BB8E03858D32; Wed, 15 Nov 2023 10:37:24 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BB8E03858D32
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1700044644;
	bh=nczxfaiMF913E18ufMg7BLGn+ac+PEmJHrqFvsnPl7s=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=g0MWGbc1vj37ZaLv+T20xqK17bUNWBlU5BaYbFkmu5WVkRvD7yQVFSCRGcCQpJ4md
	 uTSRTPKFXcYQiT5d152y+TZK66xsDUxfWL5mqxTjPjpdFeI4OG9ZkfGqqph1hGT1an
	 Ot7li/5sUQndwEGLsbLqjlLZUNdLAALo2BLmno5U=
From: "leni536 at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/111776] ICE on delete expression with multiple viable
 destroying operator delete
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 10:37:24 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: leni536 at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-111776-4-EClq3ra7T8@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111776-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111776-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111776

--- Comment #3 from L=C3=A9n=C3=A1rd Szolnoki <leni536 at gmail dot com> ---
The C++ standard currently doesn't specify what the behavior of these progr=
am
snippets are. This is CWG2805.

https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2805.html=