From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id DCABF3858C2F; Thu, 12 Oct 2023 07:56:54 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DCABF3858C2F
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1697097414;
	bh=9WoEAljnUnlXc3L41YvMyeEaYu6DLGW81dBWEXZ6hrg=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:From;
	b=JOZlNTLyhNHdpszxpNUZ/oUSzwI+PLI9W1FwDzHjSRLY7slnCgQkQfG/H9WY78Bg7
	 ba91Rs/35S/qaTQvWEtqZ59hmuHskZ6m0bJfAQK/Nw5J3IlXZRsm1w6ac0MwryEUnL
	 RYCAife5qi2ABY6KHKMQ01EiNwkqRlBxBtxw0kSU=
From: "652023330028 at smail dot nju.edu.cn" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/111780] New: Missed optimization of
 '(t*4)/(t*2) -> 2'
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 07:56:54 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: 652023330028 at smail dot nju.edu.cn
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status
 bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-111780-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111780

            Bug ID: 111780
           Summary: Missed optimization of '(t*4)/(t*2) -> 2'
           Product: gcc
           Version: 14.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: tree-optimization
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: 652023330028 at smail dot nju.edu.cn
  Target Milestone: ---

Hello, we found some optimizations (regarding Arithmetic optimization) that=
 GCC
may have missed. We would greatly appreicate if you can take a look and let=
 us
know what you think.

Given the following code:
https://godbolt.org/z/G9rWK7c3q
int n1;
void func1(int a){
    if(a>1&&a<4) n1=3D(a+a+a+a)/(a+a);
}

Different from PR 111718, this missed optimization appears to be due to a
missed pattern: (t*4)/(t*2) -> 2

  # DEBUG BEGIN_STMT
  # RANGE [irange] int [8, 8][12, 12] NONZERO 0xc
  _3 =3D a_7(D) * 4;
  # RANGE [irange] int [4, 4][6, 6] NONZERO 0x6
  _4 =3D a_7(D) * 2;
  # RANGE [irange] int [1, 3] NONZERO 0x3
  _5 =3D _3 / _4;
  # .MEM_9 =3D VDEF <.MEM_8(D)>
  n1D.2761 =3D _5;

Or a more general pattern: (t*m)/(t*n) -> m/n , where m and n are constants.

Thank you very much for your time and effort! We look forward to hearing fr=
om
you.=