From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id E1378385E446; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 20:25:27 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E1378385E446
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1710534327;
	bh=cvQOe1CJF0ctNjVq5o6kWZXR3iz5ifoJPpUk44CVEoo=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=exI4K4jaTlWWiqFcZbbLChgLMKXCRy6RaWIGErtHZS2DtFChhSQiEXu/R4qnX41Ux
	 1qzBE5NOxkJcNULNUACqSjEtOlAht2mGZnVsWcRismHYnuzJ+09VY5L9ovFJsncFb2
	 qajN2tcQyjmtdlfp3EpUVIs3SI/m6mLiLbxePrnQ=
From: "mikael at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/111781] Fortran compiler complains about variable bound
 in array dummy argument
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 20:25:27 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-111781-4-SVbB9iq7HD@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111781-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111781-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111781

--- Comment #9 from Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #8)
> (In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #7)
> > FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr98016.f90   -O  (test for excess errors)
> > Excess errors:
> > /home/mik/gcc/gccx/src/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr98016.f90:16:16: Err=
or:
> > Variable 'n' cannot appear in the expression at (1)
>=20
> This is wrong: the testcase looks valid to me.
>=20
Yes, to me as well.
So the patch needs more work.  :-(

> > FAIL: gfortran.dg/graphite/pr107865.f90   -O  (test for excess errors)
> > Excess errors:
> > /home/mik/gcc/gccx/src/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/graphite/pr107865.f90:=
7:18:
> > Error: Variable 'n' cannot appear in the expression at (1)
>=20
> Hmmm, not diagnosed by Intel.
>=20
Strange that it is able to diagnose the other, but not this one.

>=20
> We obviously have several invalid testcases in the testsuite...
> Probably just bad reductions.

Yes, variables named inout especially look like dubious (but valid) reducti=
ons.=