From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id A16E53858C3A; Thu, 12 Oct 2023 19:28:24 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A16E53858C3A
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1697138904;
	bh=p+YtaGbMdWqLtzJ+btiXYhLgS57pSOumWGZW7juqDIM=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=bPqJpewlTVLZQunc4VnsD+ntjx063EtqsGGEVuf/cR5NL4ar7czHDyPy3Fn2d/KWZ
	 s/3ZfI6/yAtNYSKnvCKhKElaefy9brbrCyMqA4VOybwsIqUclNUOMuTV1f2FOXSOFm
	 cQGGohjBuN76NDvdfES+uP7sBPMr+Z8F/k0c8RDM=
From: "anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/111783] 'exit' intrinsic should be marked as noreturn
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 19:28:24 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-111783-4-zZrBrcEG8P@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111783-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111783-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111783

--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #2)
> This leaves ABORT and EXIT to deal with.

Speaking to myself:

subroutine s1()
  call exit(1)
  stop 98
end

subroutine s2()
  call abort
  stop 99
end

Here the STOP statements do not show up in .optimized.

So I am wondering where the _gfortran_exit_i4 in comment#0 come from?=