From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id C83563858D1E; Wed,  8 Nov 2023 11:13:56 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C83563858D1E
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1699442036;
	bh=5wnlRqipJ8a0K2gR+J4pKCI6rMkMC7WqQ5hUWb+Zjc4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=YTHlocIzQG1VRvf9uGiQ8TFPFKEQmRL3Xx4eGuzPkhzZ2glqQV2q436OrQC7Payn6
	 0P0NjS6x1RJ0tXTpXDdhs8wJlO7E/Mtcb9vgPu69t2mtJAVLf2BkAxE1ZHdbF0STZc
	 mhDMSfXLmMgkEkBRVPQ7pLw/DhFZMHIsBOl6ZBg8=
From: "gprocida at google dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/111788] g++ DWARF for void foo(...) missing unspecified
 parameters DIE
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2023 11:13:56 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-debug
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: gprocida at google dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-111788-4-AK67xszpil@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111788-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111788-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111788

--- Comment #4 from Giuliano Procida <gprocida at google dot com> ---
Also worth noting that while Clang gives virtual table entries (for struct =
X)
this type in DWARF:

int(** _vptr.X)(...)

GCC gives them this type:

int(** _vptr$X)()

The different member names are an unfortunate inconsistency.

Clang is strictly better on the typing, stating that the virtual functions =
take
an unknown number of arguments. Perhaps even better would have been if the
first argument had been specified as type X*.

In any case, this is likely all cosmetic as debuggers have all the special
knowledge needed.=