From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 5AD72385841C; Thu, 1 Feb 2024 23:25:29 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5AD72385841C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1706829929; bh=BSojPxk8sZGvuv/qsOr/i7h9GX0LpBRbBO18rgrFn90=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=K/zSkKyh0TNRof9EszzjTFVwHUz7asF51mhfACre2e2OIRmRZ36vfojbXAge9OcDe hUBT4OFBlkasTdqlaS3+70RPc6F5NA9u/ZN6Ps5q1Zhs0QSUguW7nju7tt/NJRW7cf KJA2kCV82l/QRxgn41cdkvmYQm4DkLu/5lecVVkw= From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/111790] [12/13/14 Regression] Unwarranted missing template keyword warning Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2024 23:25:28 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111790 Marek Polacek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Started with r12-6563-gb8ffa71e4271ae: commit b8ffa71e4271ae562c2d315b9b24c4979bbf8227 Author: Anthony Sharp Date: Sat Dec 4 17:23:22 2021 +0000 c++: warning for dependent template members [PR70417] But is seems to me this is the case of a false positive talks about. Wrapping "x.v < 0" in () suppresses the warning.=