From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id D317C385E450; Sat,  9 Mar 2024 05:43:18 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D317C385E450
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1709962998;
	bh=yEQZ77surZNpkhTNiltusbk6BKvxGWdt4mPAADN5OaE=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=EHmpM0/LL8+NyxFJt0rqHwEKrTyxQY4dGnOLf1Tyn/VQIUYYFk+878HQYnrxVXvHh
	 oH2ON4onC1066qoDCvoo1fMtA1nSN/rkSnpZL+ArbMO18m8TDsvkKhKE0Ye/uRX5J2
	 OkVcFvBa5MuBYwgLg1BhOP+GxWQkn9NUV5Bgpt/Q=
From: "law at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/111799] [14 Regression] Missed Dead Code Elimination
 since  r14-2365-g2e406f0753e
Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2024 05:43:17 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, TREE
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: law at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-111799-4-fmjH7Fp7hc@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111799-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111799-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111799

--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I'd hazard a guess we need to first eliminate the ad =3D &c assignment.  Th=
at
should in turn allow us to realize ad is unchanging.=