From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 92A00385E009; Sat,  9 Mar 2024 05:38:00 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 92A00385E009
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1709962680;
	bh=GKWfyjQazGUHm8iwCfBgmFJHzKXvn8eOIIP9V5JYrwA=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=wwXCnJfC3aHewmcLOjbkxEClNq4lob7EKX/FsSU2QH0f46N8FB2UDEz0VAz1ZcHGv
	 dj6g2UXXcwDc+8Pb6BnACCbluoFoq8ab7GyHupcasQV9/1Lvy4r1SOi+/OhkDrF+vr
	 YMe15/h7Ie/OoF7HmLqHf5lr0O/mrnnbe6t7GjdQ=
From: "law at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/111801] [14 Regression] Missed Dead Code
 Elimination since r14-4141-gbf6b107e2a3
Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2024 05:37:59 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: law at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-111801-4-w65c6x2py9@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111801-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111801-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111801

--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at gcc dot gnu.org> ---

Interestingly enough this is picked up at -O3.  Looks like PRE does a better
job and the result is easier to discover the range for first operand of the
controlling conditional.=