From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 686393858404; Thu, 19 Oct 2023 16:06:58 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 686393858404
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1697731618;
	bh=3gUwNLBOx8s+j2lxgZVv80v2x5FsdxfGAUoJwzbDIZQ=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=HXVia3WPahxeE1LBrnq6zUvxgkzHd0jGwCtZujAj+bIgreq3pu/qYPnGR42OW0IE8
	 1082OYKq2azPPgJHnXCiMP8mHnsA9+2/S1bSkdlsFAB2kL9L9rtsZjQ+R3GqxMh3nb
	 8uFEmEj1cZaX94S7NU9gAK6VeFHIsCpCcFxFfCXs=
From: "kargl at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/111880] [9/10/11/12/13] False positive warning of
 obsolescent COMMON block with Fortran submodule
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 16:06:58 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P5
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_severity priority
Message-ID: <bug-111880-4-1AeOWH0Fqb@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-111880-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-111880-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111880

kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |enhancement
           Priority|P3                          |P5

--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to zed.three from comment #0)
>  Warning: Fortran 2018 obsolescent feature: COMMON block at (1)
>   foo.f90:14:14:
>=20=20=20
>      14 | submodule (foo) foo_submod
>         |              1
>   Warning: Fortran 2018 obsolescent feature: COMMON block at (1)
>=20

Not sure I would call this a false positive as the=20
locus is pointing at module 'foo', and 'foo' contains
a common block.=