From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id D37623858000; Fri, 20 Oct 2023 09:55:01 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D37623858000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1697795701; bh=UWU+gSm41BHfuKFezbJDDQk0A/BdXnKXum8OnLzVw6E=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=g/LELN2CRDbxcMGExrcLNFxl6qpTK9Q7K2qIP2n+bSgOmIRvHE5YrwcjiS5F6m+WQ UZu7F/oMrHFRHJyRsjYyTAqQ92qgNntvtPVOF5Jko3TIYl0xK+/KuR/H5q8NVeGOpN ka7Bj6fTU7Csc3xl1CMY7jF6QMvx6qm3O9K4vxQg= From: "avieira at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/111882] [13/14 Regression] : internal compiler error: in get_expr_operand in ifcvt with Variable length arrays and bitfields inside a struct Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 09:55:01 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-checking, ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: avieira at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: avieira at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111882 avieira at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |avieira at gcc dot gnu.org Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |avieira at gcc dot = gnu.org --- Comment #3 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org --- Taking this, first time I see a SAVE_EXPR. It looks like it indicates side-effects, I'm gonna see if I can detect the presence of side-effects and reject lowering if so. Does that sound OK?=