public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug modula2/111956] Many powerpc platforms do _not_ have support for IEEE754 long double
Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2023 07:27:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-111956-4-P8Oo0ANzoF@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-111956-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111956

--- Comment #10 from Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
In addition to what Maciej said (..., and similarly, I don't have any proper
knowledge about PowerPC details):

(In reply to Gaius Mulley from comment #6)
> Created attachment 56522 [details]
> Proposed fix v5

Thanks for looking into this!

> Here is the latest patch which [...] 96
> failures on gcc135.  [...]

With no special 'configure' flags, I'm seeing (presumably) those, too.

I noticed in 'build-gcc/gcc/m2/config-make' (generated from
'gcc/m2/config-make.in'):

    # Does the target have -mabi=ieeelongdouble support in libm?  (yes/no).
    HAVE_TARGET_LONG_DOUBLE_IEEE = @have_target_long_double_ieee@

..., so missing 'AC_SUBST' or similar -- but is that actually unused?

I further noticed the following delta when regenerating 'libgm2/configure':

     case "$target" in
        powerpc*-*-linux*)
    -     LONG_DOUBLE_COMPAT_FLAGS="$LONG_DOUBLE_COMPAT_FLAGS
-mno-gnu-attribute"
          # Check for IEEE128 support in libm:


(In reply to Gaius Mulley from comment #8)
> Here is the same patch as v5 but generated using git diff -w.

Please don't include unrelated changes (here: whitespace cleanup); handle that
separately (if you must).  ;-)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-11-09  7:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-24 15:47 [Bug modula2/111956] New: " gaius at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-25 23:33 ` [Bug modula2/111956] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-31  9:23 ` tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-01 13:52 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-04 19:11 ` gaius at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-04 20:24 ` macro at orcam dot me.uk
2023-11-07 14:12 ` gaius at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-07 14:15 ` gaius at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-07 14:18 ` gaius at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-09  2:29 ` macro at orcam dot me.uk
2023-11-09  7:27 ` tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2023-11-09 10:27 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-14 16:38 ` gaius at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-15  7:36 ` [Bug modula2/111956] [14 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-16  1:05 ` gaius at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-16  7:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-16 10:22 ` gaiusmod2 at gmail dot com
2024-01-16 14:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-17  1:12 ` gaius at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-18  0:25 ` gaius at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-18  0:29 ` gaius at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-18 13:07 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-18 16:42 ` gaius at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-111956-4-P8Oo0ANzoF@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).