From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 8D0E1385701B; Thu, 26 Oct 2023 10:28:03 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8D0E1385701B
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1698316083;
	bh=p1SWmEB/xCFaz0eIjNpHb9nwdzuLsKJnuO+W0scqNP8=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=KtIToM4CcPdqbZwLDhhAMxvM9RP0/v4Pg0a/zQSQPMol+J5G4hqz0msOCQvW8TWYu
	 ZZq+Q3JMkTbxm4SPomxB2uzuRP2ivXv/3438YkiNUKoExpVL7fuWKRiWYGIgfCcxcj
	 PjWM9iCiBv18+pGHteNKVSU8Fh1xlEwu0DFedKjw=
From: "bruno at clisp dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/112098] suboptimal optimization of inverted bit
 extraction
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 10:28:03 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: bruno at clisp dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-112098-4-S20yZmcsx7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-112098-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-112098-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112098

--- Comment #1 from Bruno Haible <bruno at clisp dot org> ---
The code that gets executed inside gcc is maybe the one mentioned in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109907#c2 .=