From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 71D2C3858D1E; Thu,  9 Nov 2023 18:37:43 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 71D2C3858D1E
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1699555063;
	bh=CZk5DEZ4qGMAVwC4jOgBEO9NUNYqw/RpYpeZSjJ0ZD4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=dfAI0LR2wqLsXZXEySPTJuBYs4pSeMFJcvNV46ykk/L2u5DLzLOPxUuifhNS7xXjX
	 C2BuCaIUZIzn//HSM8o8nhP1pfBcn9FbAzsBE0wIXuDKx4x8oowd6Khg9RLIlYEywQ
	 4CC4/G8HtUhkPhtazL25kTYQNNMqAxLy5mQOk4wE=
From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/112103] [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/rlwinm-0.c
 fails after r14-4941-gd1bb9569d70304
Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2023 18:37:43 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-112103-4-4b11VsfdIe@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-112103-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-112103-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112103

--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
In all those cases the code is perfectly fine, but also in all of those cas=
es
the
code is still suboptimal: the rldicl is just as superfluous as the second
rlwinm
was!  :-)=