From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 6B7CB3857BAF; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 19:01:12 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6B7CB3857BAF
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1708110072;
	bh=X3uWoGLay2Ov18wmjDTn6lsHXBVfKihYhwTygPTsY/4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=EEgbwI/Gcz6Pt/FpNWkUtdqveG44LRxMFw+Oo5lUeB89z+KsXD34kUQL5/7/ZiD7w
	 QNkvX/oveqDQQ8vTMsvh6WOqDaVQizan/pzUWk1204IxVl4Wmz9bc2PeCt8atqRbbQ
	 mjP+UZFH6qZp5poCh3VkTH8LBM/ESKP4kGrh1g3E=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/112103] [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/rlwinm-0.c
 fails after r14-4941-gd1bb9569d70304
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 19:01:10 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-112103-4-NXeEwrCRno@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-112103-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-112103-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112103

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
So, let's just adjust the testcase then?=