From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id CA6EE385350F; Sat, 28 Oct 2023 06:32:29 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org CA6EE385350F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1698474749; bh=1HxzNKLxjrxGNnVEVXEu/TGlHsjunJjWSH+1+oMHc3w=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=pH1NvlxVAoACyTfmCEPv6YHwcyjiUQjUP/NtC0xg0ZgFzBSy/3H6PXZfXdYha/OyG 2hscP2b8tDYHMw7lsUUFLaR9z/bgxv6n9UrFoQ342TSmoXGH+DANEUYnkaSuMZ8vj/ oECe8q9UgaqFpIHb+nuQ8Fwj6oYxqxQNwr4lx3AQ= From: "22s302h0659 at sonline20 dot sen.go.kr" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/112112] Improper Arithmetic Type Conversion in s390x-linux-gnu-gcc Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2023 06:32:29 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.4.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: 22s302h0659 at sonline20 dot sen.go.kr X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112112 --- Comment #4 from =EA=B9=80=EB=8C=80=EC=98=81 <22s302h0659 at sonline20 d= ot sen.go.kr> --- >From your perspective, do you think this could be a compiler bug? When test= ed with various compiler options following the GCC bug reporting guidelines, t= he binary compiles without any warnings, yet exhibits these behaviors=