public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "sjames at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/112280] [14 regression] ICE building libgcrypt-1.10.2 on s390 (during GIMPLE pass: ccp) Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2023 08:01:22 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-112280-4-UCaqRBWzCG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-112280-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112280 --- Comment #4 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Minimised. ``` $ gcc -O3 -c rijndael.i -march=arch13 -mzarch rijndael.i:30:18: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘buf_put_le64’ makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion] 30 | buf_put_le64(cipher_bulk_ops_t_outbuf_arg, __trans_tmp_5 ^ tweak_lo); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | | | int rijndael.i:8:25: note: expected ‘void *’ but argument is of type ‘int’ 8 | void buf_put_le64(void *_buf, long long val) { | ~~~~~~^~~~ rijndael.i:32:47: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘buf_put_le64’ makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion] 32 | buf_put_le64(cipher_bulk_ops_t_outbuf_arg + 8, __trans_tmp_2 ^ tweak_hi); | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~ | | | int rijndael.i:8:25: note: expected ‘void *’ but argument is of type ‘int’ 8 | void buf_put_le64(void *_buf, long long val) { | ~~~~~~^~~~ during GIMPLE pass: ccp rijndael.i:12:6: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault 12 | void cipher_bulk_ops_t() { | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 0x578bc41b internal_error(char const*, ...) ???:0 0x5611d4f6 gen_rtx_SUBREG(machine_mode, rtx_def*, poly_int<1u, unsigned long long>) ???:0 0x56cbfcbb s390_vectorize_vec_perm_const(machine_mode, machine_mode, rtx_def*, rtx_def*, rtx_def*, vec_perm_indices const&) ???:0 0x5656e4b3 can_vec_perm_const_p(machine_mode, machine_mode, vec_perm_indices const&, bool) ???:0 0x57784b87 gimple_simplify_VEC_PERM_EXPR(gimple_match_op*, gimple**, tree_node* (*)(tree_node*), code_helper, tree_node*, tree_node*, tree_node*, tree_node*) ???:0 0x56e5b3cf gimple_simplify(gimple_match_op*, gimple**, tree_node* (*)(tree_node*), code_helper, tree_node*, tree_node*, tree_node*, tree_node*) ???:0 0x56f95e7f gimple_simplify(gimple*, gimple_match_op*, gimple**, tree_node* (*)(tree_node*), tree_node* (*)(tree_node*)) ???:0 0x562568b1 gimple_fold_stmt_to_constant_1(gimple*, tree_node* (*)(tree_node*), tree_node* (*)(tree_node*)) ???:0 0x569fca5f ssa_propagation_engine::simulate_stmt(gimple*) ???:0 0x569fcdd3 ssa_propagation_engine::simulate_block(basic_block_def*) ???:0 0x569fd411 ssa_propagation_engine::ssa_propagate() ???:0 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source (by using -freport-bug). Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report. See <https://bugs.gentoo.org/> for instructions. ``` ``` $ cat rijndael.i typedef struct { long long a; } bufhelp_u64_t; int cipher_bulk_ops_t_outbuf_arg, cipher_bulk_ops_t_nblocks, cipher_bulk_ops_t__buf; long long cipher_bulk_ops_t___trans_tmp_4; long long buf_get_le64(int _buf) { return __builtin_bswap64(((bufhelp_u64_t *)_buf)->a); } void buf_put_le64(void *_buf, long long val) { bufhelp_u64_t *out = _buf; out->a = __builtin_bswap64(val); } void cipher_bulk_ops_t() { long long __trans_tmp_5, __trans_tmp_3, __trans_tmp_2, tweak_lo, tweak_hi, tweak_next_lo, tweak_next_hi, carry; { __trans_tmp_3 = __builtin_bswap64(cipher_bulk_ops_t__buf); } tweak_next_lo = __trans_tmp_3; { int _buf; cipher_bulk_ops_t___trans_tmp_4 = __builtin_bswap64(_buf); } tweak_next_hi = cipher_bulk_ops_t___trans_tmp_4; while (cipher_bulk_ops_t_nblocks) { tweak_lo = tweak_next_lo; tweak_hi = tweak_next_hi; tweak_next_hi = tweak_next_lo = carry; { __trans_tmp_5 = __builtin_bswap64(((bufhelp_u64_t *)cipher_bulk_ops_t_outbuf_arg)->a); } buf_put_le64(cipher_bulk_ops_t_outbuf_arg, __trans_tmp_5 ^ tweak_lo); __trans_tmp_2 = buf_get_le64(cipher_bulk_ops_t_outbuf_arg + 8); buf_put_le64(cipher_bulk_ops_t_outbuf_arg + 8, __trans_tmp_2 ^ tweak_hi); cipher_bulk_ops_t_nblocks--; } } ```
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-30 8:01 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-10-29 20:48 [Bug target/112280] New: " sjames at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-10-29 20:48 ` [Bug target/112280] " sjames at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-10-29 21:36 ` [Bug target/112280] [14 regression] " sjames at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-10-29 21:36 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-10-30 8:01 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2023-10-30 14:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-10-31 17:12 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-11-05 23:20 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-11-06 2:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-11-28 16:13 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-01-11 14:00 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-01-12 6:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-01-12 6:59 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-112280-4-UCaqRBWzCG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).