From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 813713858D37; Fri,  3 Nov 2023 10:01:36 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 813713858D37
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1699005696;
	bh=GJhDFP3CiP4x9esTfOpXjLXaprR7df8l2GPvpI8AuDA=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=HIx9bxyoExUIhBZfZvbOfWddh/2YuRT2rPIIc2T0wZQ57FizQAGiLXXh/hep5jlLv
	 /pLYE6rcP9xMrejoGnfVzjem720j7j4C7T+a7Od1qm4Fa0sf7l0xQ7iRmnDZxg3UyX
	 xEWYmkClasRdiv9t6K/OBwH8J9v5cTm+6RhRXLck=
From: "alexander.grund@tu-dresden.de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/112301] [12/13/14 regression] Double destruction of
 returned object when exiting the scope causes an exception which gets
 rethrown since r12-6333-gb10e031458d541
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2023 10:01:35 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.3.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: alexander.grund@tu-dresden.de
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jason at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-112301-4-mki2hg4945@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-112301-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-112301-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112301

--- Comment #4 from Alexander Grund <alexander.grund@tu-dresden.de> ---
Thank you! Will there be backports for 12.x?

The current patch is conflicting due to "c++: enable NRVO from inner block
[PR51571]" and while it seems to be easy enough to backport both patches in
order I'm not sure about possible side effects due to that especially how s=
ome
additionally introduced NRVOs can affect interoperability of programs/libra=
ries
compiled before and after that change.=