From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 860A7385828D; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 10:36:13 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 860A7385828D
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1711449373;
	bh=W544goA9qdiKGir+z00FN6IEWbnD8+juJ98Xx4cCcBQ=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=BtDGpPPEnNBeRQRO4kOORXl+QyiPlmp04pfgXOSeFPTTx/lhXTLHy9kYBW6sQKv8D
	 VqoWDkRtSqlOOkSfcVjiE27X3Q6oMODdCeUmdhr1NdSnNmqfT1ruu3xayJrSmY05Tm
	 wwVpkMmGMhu9h4/GoZqB0gOQPvws8x3Bjn7gUhws=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/112303] [14 Regression] ICE on valid code at
 -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: verify_flow_info failed since
 r14-3459-g0c78240fd7d519
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 10:36:11 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-112303-4-L0xwJJ8GTU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-112303-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-112303-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112303

--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Looks like so, can you test that?  I think !(bb->count >=3D new_count) is g=
ood,
we're using this kind of compare regularly.=